Case Studies
Learn how customers improve velocity and quality with Rainforest.
The Access Group
Access Group's daily releases and nightly deployments require constant testing. But full manual regression testing took weeks, creating risks of bugs and poor client experiences.
Cireson
Cireson's manual QA process was slow and unreliable. Tracking tests on a spreadsheet became cumbersome, and developers spent excessive time on manual testing, delaying releases.
Flux
Flux initially used Cypress for automated testing, but its complexity slowed down test creation and maintenance. Developers resisted using it, resulting in unreliable tests and escaped bugs.
Inverifi
Inverifi's goal was to release software quickly, but manual testing slowed them down. By the time testers found bugs, developers were already busy working on other features.
JustProtect
Traditional QA solutions like hiring internal testers wouldn't work for JustProtect. Their budget constraints and fast release cycle required a more efficient and cost-effective approach.
PayHOA
PayHOA’s five developers had been shipping with urgency and expanding the team — but they started breaking things multiple times a day, without a reliable testing process to catch the issues. Dale, CTO, needed an efficient and scalable way to handle QA, but hiring a full-time QA person was an expensive and ultimately unsuccessful process.
PixieBrix
PixieBrix was growing and needed a scalable way to accelerate testing — particularly for their browser extension, the core of their offering. QA was important, partly because the process of securing Chrome Web Store approval meant it could take days for bug fixes to reach customers. But their initial QA approach — a long, manual QA checklist — took up too much engineering time.
Push Security
Push Security's software team struggled with end-to-end testing. Since manual testing was too time-consuming and unreliable, they adopted a no-code tool to transition to automation — but staying on top of test maintenance was unmanageable for their developers.
Signagelive
Signagelive struggled with slow and unreliable manual testing — customers found bugs before the QA team did. They needed a faster solution that could give them confidence in the accuracy of the app’s user interface.
Tikit
Tikit's fast-paced CI/CD pipeline required easy-to-manage test automation. Plus, testing needed to account for their integration with Microsoft Teams, a platform outside their control.
YNAB
With a small QA team and a rapidly-evolving, multi-platform product, YNAB struggled to keep up with end-to-end testing — especially with the burden of test maintenance.